Doritos ran a Superbowl contest where users could submit their own commercials and the winners commercial was played during the Superbowl. The winner of the contest just happened to be a group of 21 year olds from where I live now, Cary, North Carolina. If have not seen the commercial, you can view it below.

I have been reading this morning all these posts from “advertising executives” that the quality of this user generated commercial and user generated commercials in general are no where close to the professionally done ones. Here are some responses:

“The Doritos user-generated ad wasn’t our choice, but got great laughs. It just needs a stronger ending.”

“Doritos. User generated content. Don’t give up your day job. …”

“Doritos user-generated spot: I hope this commercial finally dispels the myth of user- generated content, and most importantly as a submission-based campaign. It doesn’t work. These spots aren’t good, or funny, and there is a reason people get paid to make ads for a living.”

Quotes were found here.

My response: Please… The Doritos commercial which was made for less than $15 dollars proves that content can be created on par with commercials that are created by big advertising agencies for millions upon millions of dollars. Tell me 5 commercials that aired last night that were significantly better than the Doritos commercial?

YouTube Preview Image

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)

Technorati Tags: , ,

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes Sp
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • De.lirio.us
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netscape
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • SphereIt
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb
StumbleUpon It!

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post